[petsc-dev] Handling pull requests in a better way
Patrick Sanan
patrick.sanan at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 07:04:43 CST 2018
Maybe it would also help to add more explicit instructions to the wiki (
https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/Home#markdown-header-contributing-to-petsc)
on how to construct a branch that is likely to get through the integration
steps quickly.
I'd suggest adding language about these (and volunteer to write it), even
if some might be obvious:
- Adding tests for whatever you submit
- Testing with configurations other than the usual double/real/C setup
(complex, single)
- Making the PR as small/atomic as possible (can your PR be 2 or more
separate PRs?)
- Running through valgrind (using --download-mpich) before submitting
2018-03-01 12:33 GMT+01:00 Karl Rupp <rupp at iue.tuwien.ac.at>:
> Dear PETSc folks,
>
> I think we can do a better job when it comes to handling pull requests
> (PRs). We have several PRs piling up, which after some time (imho) get
> merged relatively carelessly instead of reaping the full benefits of a
> thorough review.
>
> In order to improve the integration of pull requests, I propose to
> nominate a PR integrator, who is a-priori responsible for *all* incoming
> PRs. The PR integrator is free to delegate a particular PR integration to
> someone with the relevant domain-specific knowledge (e.g. Matt for
> DMPlex-related things) by appropriate comments on Bitbucket. In case of
> delays, the PR integrator is also responsible for issuing reminders over
> time (like Barry has done in the past).
>
> The idea is to make daily progress with the PRs. One integration step per
> day (e.g. testing or merging to next) is presumably enough to handle the
> load, whereas things get messy if we let things pile up. Automated testing
> may help a bit in the future, but it doesn't release us from properly
> reviewing the contributed code.
Any objections to my PR integrator proposal? Any volunteers? ;-)
> If nobody else wants to be the highly esteemed PR integrator, I can do it.
> ;-)
>
> Best regards,
> Karli
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20180301/fadf31ef/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list