[petsc-dev] SETERRQ in fortran

[Jed Brown]

"Smith, Barry F." <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>> On Jan 31, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I think his point is that Fortran has a one-line if statement (no then
>> and no endif), which simplifies the macro and usage.
>> 
>>  if (cond) SETERRQ(...)
>
>    That doesn't work because the SETERRQ() has both the call to the error handler followed by a return which is two lines in Fortran.

Ah, right.  Would it make sense for PetscError to call MPI_Abort when
called in this context?