[petsc-dev] triangle is filled with calls to random() no reproducibility here

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Wed Jan 17 01:25:43 CST 2018


On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
wrote:

>
>   Sorry, I should have said ctetgen
>

Yes. Jon was careful in Triangle to use the robust predicates from David
Bailey, and it should be reproducible.
TetGen does not care at all about that. For tests, it would be nice to
create a structured tet mesh for the unit
cell, but it was low on my list.

   Matt


> > On Jan 16, 2018, at 10:47 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at anl.gov> wrote:
> >
>
-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20180117/a24331e8/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list