[petsc-dev] TSComputeRHSJacobian

Stefano Zampini stefano.zampini at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 11:51:23 CDT 2017


I encountered the problem while working on the adjoint code. Here is the
fix I have in my branch

https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/stefano_zampini/feature-continuousadjoint#Lsrc/ts/interface/ts.cT613

However, I'm not sure if this is a problem just with my code. This is why
I'm asking on the list.



2017-09-08 0:02 GMT+03:00 Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>:

>
>   Example that demonstrates the current code is problematic in some cases?
>
> > On Aug 28, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Stefano Zampini <stefano.zampini at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if the following code in TSComputeRHSJacobian is correct
> when the user pass the reuse flag via TSRHSJacobianReuse
> >
> >   if (ts->rhsjacobian.time == t && (ts->problem_type == TS_LINEAR ||
> (ts->rhsjacobian.Xid == Uid && ts->rhsjacobian.Xstate == Ustate)) &&
> (rhsfunction != TSComputeRHSFunctionLinear)) {
> >     PetscFunctionReturn(0);
> >   }
> >
> > Should the above code be replaced by the following?
> >
> >   if (ts->rhsjacobian.time == t && (ts->problem_type == TS_LINEAR ||
> (ts->rhsjacobian.Xid == Uid && ts->rhsjacobian.Xstate == Ustate)) &&
> (rhsfunction != TSComputeRHSFunctionLinear)) {
> >     if (ts->rhsjacobian.reuse) {
> >       ierr = MatShift(A,-ts->rhsjacobian.shift);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> >       ierr = MatScale(A,1./ts->rhsjacobian.scale);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> >       if (B && A != B) {
> >         ierr = MatShift(B,-ts->rhsjacobian.shift);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> >         ierr = MatScale(B,1./ts->rhsjacobian.scale);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> >       }
> >       ts->rhsjacobian.shift = 0;
> >       ts->rhsjacobian.scale = 1.;
> >     }
> >     PetscFunctionReturn(0);
> >   }
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stefano
>
>


-- 
Stefano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20170908/52afdfa5/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list