[petsc-dev] broken nightlybuilds (next vs next-tmp)
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Sat Nov 11 12:49:26 CST 2017
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> Merging is synchronous. If I do
>
> git checkout master
> git pull
> git merge jed/risky-business
> make alltests # works on my machine
Note: this is my recommendation for the *currentK next model.
If you are running 'make alltests' on your laptop - then you don't need to test on es - before merge to maint.
My suggestion on using es is for Matt - who says he can't run tests on his laptop.
> Satish and Barry, is this really the workflow you're advocating?
What Barry is advocating is throwing away next. Perhaps he'll explain
what his thoughts are.. [I've expressed my interpration]
In the new model [since most folks are not doing any local testing] -
the above merge and (multiple) tests would be done with some automated
test suite we would cook up - similar to what we are doing currently
with next
Note: If it can't do the merge - it will throw back the isssue back to
the author. If the tests are successful - it [or one of us] would do
the merge to master.
satish
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list