[petsc-dev] Can we eliminate support for std::complex?

[Tobin Isaac]

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:30:18AM -0500, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> I have Googled, but I still cannot understand this
> 
> 
> http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/05/02/examples_next_arch-linux-cxx-cmplx-pkgs-64idx_churn.log
> 
> It appears in another one as well. Does anyone know how to fix this?
> Otherwise I am turning off ex11 for C++.
> 
> This is the last problem before merging the Plex tests (modulo jitter in
> iteration counts on two boxes which I assume we live with until the parser
> is better).

I'm changing the unions from PetscScalar to PetscReal right now.  C++
thinks that std::complex<double> is funky enough that you can't put it
in a union uninitialized.

> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>     Matt
> 
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20170502/8a036831/attachment.sig>