[petsc-dev] SpMM question

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 15:42:56 CST 2017


On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Have we considered using this
> >
> >   https://github.com/solomonik/ctf
> >
> > as an alternative sparse matrix-matrix code for GAMG? Or was it
> unsuitable
> > for some reason.
>
> I don't think we considered it for that purpose.  I'm not sure if its
> dynamicism would work against us here.
>

I took a look at the code. It is the worst kind of C-in-C++, It would
probably take 1 day to make a pure C version :)
The claim from Edgar is that it is intended to be used for this purpose
(have you read the arXiv thing with Torsten
about sparse tensor computing?).

   Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20170218/f3cba6f6/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list