[petsc-dev] [petsc-users] FindPETSc.cmake expects petscvariables in wrong location
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Apr 11 13:33:39 CDT 2017
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Jed Brown wrote:
> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>
> >> On Apr 11, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke at fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> The PETSc FAQ recommends to use the FindPETSc.cmake module
> >
> > Jed,
> >
> > Is it time to update the PETSc FAQ and remove the "recommendation"? I thought you had developed a simpler way of handling that does not require cmake?
>
> The pkg-config updates are in 'maint', but have not yet been released
> (in 3.7.5). I would say we should update the recommendations when we
> release 3.8.
We should at some point add --download-pkg-config - hoping that would
make it universally useable [even on machines without pkg-config]
Satish
>
> If we're committing to gnumake, we can greatly improve PETSc makefiles.
> I feel dirty every time the current makefiles (with their anti-patterns
> and lack of namespacing) are recommended for users.
>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list