[petsc-dev] need C++ expert help
Jed Brown
jed at jedbrown.org
Tue Sep 13 22:54:08 CDT 2016
Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> The problem is ssize_t is not portable to Microsoft.
Is that still true?
Note that the example is buggy in the first place -- write can return
successfully after writing less than all the bytes so you typically need
to call it in a loop.
Why not make this example use fwrite -- it's portable and does what you want.
>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 3:05 PM, Munson, Todd <tmunson at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The write statement return type is ssize_t. For whatever reason its a signed type
>> because it can return -1 on error.
>>
>> I would suggest using the ssize_t type for both and changing the "!=" to a "<"
>> which will abort if write either returns a negative or the number of bytes
>> written is not correct.
>>
>> Note: you will have problems if (ssize_t) (m*n*sizeof(double)) is negative
>> though, but that can be checked as well.
>>
>> Todd.
>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> This works..
>>>
>>> Satish
>>>
>>> ---------
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c b/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c
>>> index 63d0a30..37f68e3 100644
>>> --- a/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c
>>> +++ b/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c
>>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void Store2DArray(int m,int n,double *a,const char *filename,int *fdd)
>>> vals[i+m*j] = a[j+i*n];
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - if (write(fd,vals,m*n*sizeof(double)) != ((unsigned int) (m*n))*sizeof(double)) abort();
>>> + if ((size_t)write(fd,vals,m*n*sizeof(double)) != (size_t)(m*n*sizeof(double))) abort();
>>> free(vals);
>>>
>>> }
>>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void Store1DArray(int m,double *a,const char *filename,int *fdd)
>>> }
>>> if (write(fd,&classid,sizeof(int)) != sizeof(int)) abort();
>>> if (write(fd,&m,sizeof(int)) != sizeof(int)) abort();
>>> - if (write(fd,a,m*sizeof(double)) != ((unsigned int)m)*sizeof(double)) abort();
>>> + if ((size_t)write(fd,a,m*sizeof(double)) != (size_t)(m*sizeof(double))) abort();
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Satish Balay wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would tink if its typecast to same type - comparision would work..
>>>>
>>>> if ((ssize_t)write(fd,vals,m*n*sizeof(double)) != (ssize_t)(m*n*sizeof(double))) abort();
>>>>
>>>> I'll give this a try...
>>>>
>>>> Satish
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Barry Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I need help from someone who knows the subtleties of c++. We have a PETSc example that always compiles fine with C but generates annoying warnings with C++. I've tried many different variants to eliminate the warnings with no luck
>>>>>
>>>>> Any help is appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mpicxx -o ex45.o -c -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wno-unknown-pragmas -fvisibility=hidden -g -O -fPIC -I/sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/include -I/sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/arch-linux-opt-cxx-quad/include -I/usr/include/mpich2 `pwd`/ex45.c
>>>>> /sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c: In function ‘void Store2DArray(int, int, double*, const char*, int*)’:
>>>>> /sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c:75:41: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
>>>>> if (write(fd,vals,m*n*sizeof(double)) != ((unsigned int) (m*n))*sizeof(double)) abort();
>>>>> ^
>>>>> /sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c: In function ‘void Store1DArray(int, double*, const char*, int*)’:
>>>>> /sandbox/petsc/petsc.clone-3/src/mat/examples/tests/ex45.c:97:36: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
>>>>> if (write(fd,a,m*sizeof(double)) != ((unsigned int)m)*sizeof(double)) abort();
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It can be found here ftp://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2016/09/13/examples_next_arch-linux-opt-cxx-quad_grind.log
>>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160913/43e3a6e0/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list