[petsc-dev] MatSetValues (Fortran)

Tabrez Ali stali at geology.wisc.edu
Tue Nov 22 18:38:32 CST 2016


Hello Satish

It works fine if I use MatSetValues0 instead of MatSetValues.

Tabrez

On 11/22/2016 07:25 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> f90 interface definitions for MatSetValues were added. So if you are
> including petscmat.h90 - there should interface check by the compiler.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/4d03fd2beba63756fb8890bf1826f747a8ce8800
>
> Looks like this check is failing. Does the compiler print more info on
> why it didn't find a match?
>
> Or is the compiler complaining about using MatSetValues0 - instead of
> MatSetValues here?
>
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/3b494cfec78d3366d5cde5f82eed4f6aebe3762b
>
> If you can reproduce this in a test code - that would help.
>
> Satish
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Tabrez Ali wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am using petsc-dev and today I got the following error (below) while
>> compiling the code. I guess this has to do with the Fortran interfaces but I
>> cannot spot what's wrong. Any ideas?
>>
>> Tabrez
>>
>> /opt/mpich3/bin/mpif90 -c -Wall -ffree-line-length-0
>> -Wno-unused-dummy-argument -g    -I/home/stali/petsc-dev/include
>> -I/home/stali/petsc-dev/arch-linux2-c-debug/include -I/opt/mpich3/include
>> -o main.o main.F90
>> main.F90:177:75:
>>
>>        call MatSetValues(Mat_K,ef_eldof,indx,ef_eldof,indx,k,Add_Values,ierr)
>> 1
>> Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic ‘matsetvalues’ at (1)
>>
>>




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list