[petsc-dev] asm / gasm
Mark Adams
mfadams at lbl.gov
Wed Jun 22 10:40:00 CDT 2016
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to get block smoothers to work for gamg. We (Garth) tried
>> this and got this error:
>>
>>
>> - Another option is use '-pc_gamg_use_agg_gasm true' and use
>>> '-mg_levels_pc_type gasm'.
>>>
>>>
>> Running in parallel, I get
>>
>> ** Max-trans not allowed because matrix is distributed
>> ----
>>
>> First, what is the difference between asm and gasm?
>>
>
> ASM is very simple Additive Schwarz which can have multiple blocks per
> process, but cannot have blocks spanning
> processes. GASM was meant to generalize this, but Dmitry wrote it and (to
> my knowledge) the support situation is
> uncertain. Maybe Barry know better.
>
>
>> Second, I need to fix this to get block smoothers. This used to work.
>> Did we lose the capability to have blocks that span processor subdomains?
>>
>
> Did we ever have it?
>
I thought so but it's been a long time. The code did work at one point but
now I (Garth) gets this error.
Does anyone know about this error? I don't find it with 'git grep Max-trans'
Thanks,
Mark
>
>
>> gamg only aggregates across processor subdomains within one layer, so
>> maybe I could use one layer of overlap in some way?
>>
>
> ASM can do arbitrary overlap.
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160622/3d0edefa/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list