[petsc-dev] plans for PETSc release
Jed Brown
jed at jedbrown.org
Sun Apr 24 15:26:06 CDT 2016
Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> No PETSc developer/user has ever done or is likely ever to do all
> the cool testing you think will happen during a feature freeze;
> your fantasies are quite bizarre :-).
Well, I've done this at least with PFLOTRAN and libMesh/MOOSE for
various previous releases. I'm pretty sure Lisandro has done similar
with some of his packages and Matt with PyLith. I've tested on NERSC
and ALCF early access machines. I thought others had been doing similar
as time and access allowed.
> Plus if there are testing environments not in the nightly builds
> that one "could" try during the freeze week the priority should be
> getting those environments into the nightly builds, not just
> testing on them one week a year.
The machines I'm thinking of are managed by other people and typically
not convenient to have running automated tests (sometimes due to
security like cryptocard logins). When we test a version there, we're
testing both that version of PETSc and the environment on the machine,
which are often being "upgraded" periodically.
> This is also the first time that I was aware that we ever did a
> week long feature freeze in the past! We've always done the move it
> quickly into a release approach.
We've usually had precise deadlines announced in advance, with the
release being tagged some days later. It was a literal code freeze back
in v3.3, but you're right that it has been more variable and ad-hoc than
I remembered.
v3.6:
2015-05-28: bsmith on petsc-dev "Satish and I are planning a PETSc
release by Friday June 5"
2015-06-09 Release tagged
v3.5:
2014-06-12: bsmith on petsc-dev "Please get all changes into master
before 9pm central time USA on Sunday June 15th that you would like in
the release. At that time Satish will make a release branch and the
only changes allowed in that release branch will be bug fixes that do
not change the API."
2014-06-30: Release tagged
v3.4 seems to have been relatively stealth, though there was plenty of
off-list discussion. This was shortly after we switched to Git.
v3.3:
2012-05-17: bsmith on petsc-dev "Recall that we are in a phase of a
code freeze that means do not push random new code to petsc-dev, push
only bug fixes and clean up to petsc-dev. By all means keep on with
code development, just don't push the new stuff to petsc-dev.
We hope to make the release repository (and then tarball) next
Wednesday May 23. So please do be checking the nightly builds and
making fixes to petsc-dev."
2012-06-05: Release tagged
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160424/b2b02acf/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list