[petsc-dev] Fwd: [JIRA] (SDK-82) Complete a manual test run of xSDK on Edison
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Apr 19 12:00:58 CDT 2016
Satish,
So on this machine you can compile and run programs on the front end but if they call MPI_Init() then you cannot run them?
What does this mean with regard to --with-batch? It seems we don't need --with-batch on that machine yet it cannot run MPI programs?
Barry
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "Alicia Klinvex (JIRA)" <jira at ideas-productivity.atlassian.net>
> Subject: [JIRA] (SDK-82) Complete a manual test run of xSDK on Edison
> Date: April 19, 2016 at 11:45:00 AM CDT
> To: <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
>
> Alicia Klinvex <https://ideas-productivity.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=amklinv> edited a comment on SDK-82 <https://ideas-productivity.atlassian.net/browse/SDK-82> SDK-82
>
> Re: Complete a manual test run of xSDK on Edison <https://ideas-productivity.atlassian.net/browse/SDK-82>
> Sure thing. It seems to fail at the xSDKTrilinos testing phase because you can ' s gotten all t call MPI_Init on the way login node:
>
> {noformat}
> *******************************************************************************
> UNABLE to METIS now, so I'm definitely CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS (see configure.log for details):
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Error running ctest on xSDKTrilinos: Could not seeing the same issue anymore execute "cd /global/u1/a/amklinv/dynamic_test/installxSDK/xsdk/petsc/arch-linux2-c-debug/externalpackages/git . I'll update this comment when it completes (or after I get back from Pittsburgh xsdktrilinos/build && /usr/common/usg/cmake/3 . 3 . 2/bin/ctest":
> Test project /global/u1/a/amklinv/dynamic_test/installxSDK/xsdk/petsc/arch-linux2-c-debug/externalpackages/git . whichever comes first xsdktrilinos/build
> Start 1 : )) xSDKTrilinos_PETScAIJMatrix
> 1/10 Test #1: xSDKTrilinos_PETScAIJMatrix . .........***Exception: Other 0.02 sec
> Start 2: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Amesos2_example
> 2/10 Test #2: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Amesos2_example ...***Exception: Other 0.05 sec
> Start 3: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Anasazi_example
> 3/10 Test #3: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Anasazi_example ...***Exception: Other 0.02 sec
> Start 4: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Ifpack2_example
> 4/10 Test #4: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Ifpack2_example ...***Exception: Other 0.05 sec
> Start 5: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_MueLu_example
> 5/10 Test #5: xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_MueLu_example .....***Exception: Other 0.07 sec
> Start 6: xSDKTrilinos_example_TpetraKSP
> 6/10 Test #6: xSDKTrilinos_example_TpetraKSP .......***Exception: Other 0.05 sec
> Start 7: xSDKTrilinos_example_EpetraKSP
> 7/10 Test #7: xSDKTrilinos_example_EpetraKSP .......***Exception: Other 0.01 sec
> Start 8: xSDKTrilinos_HypreTest
> 8/10 Test #8: xSDKTrilinos_HypreTest ...............***Exception: Other 0.04 sec
> Edit Start 9 : It xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Belos_example
> 9/10 Test #9: xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Belos_example .....***Exception: Other 0.04 sec
> Start 10: xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Solve_example
> 10/10 Test #10: xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Solve_example .....***Exception: Other 0.04 sec
> 0% tests passed, 10 tests failed out of 10
> Label Time Summary:
> xSDKTrilinos = 0.37 sec
> Total Test time (real) = 0.39 sec
> The following tests FAILED:
> 1 - xSDKTrilinos_PETScAIJMatrix (OTHER_FAULT)
> 2 - xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Amesos2_example (OTHER_FAULT)
> 3 - xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Anasazi_example (OTHER_FAULT)
> 4 - xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_Ifpack2_example (OTHER_FAULT)
> 5 - xSDKTrilinos_PETSc_MueLu_example (OTHER_FAULT)
> 6 - xSDKTrilinos_example_TpetraKSP (OTHER_FAULT)
> 7 - xSDKTrilinos_example_EpetraKSP (OTHER_FAULT)
> 8 - xSDKTrilinos_HypreTest (OTHER_FAULT)
> 9 - xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Belos_example (OTHER_FAULT)
> 10 - xSDKTrilinos_Hypre_Solve_example (OTHER_FAULT)Errors while running CTest
> *******************************************************************************
> {noformat}
>
> Can we document this behavior for the users so they ' s compiling Trilinos now re not surprised when they see a bunch of failing tests?
>
> I assume the next step at this point is to try again on a compute node . Is that accurate?
> <https://ideas-productivity.atlassian.net/browse/SDK-82#add-comment> Add Comment <https://ideas-productivity.atlassian.net/browse/SDK-82#add-comment>
>
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.0-OD-05-030#72002-sha1:7e8526a)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160419/30ac8485/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail Attachment.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3171 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160419/30ac8485/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail Attachment.png
Type: image/png
Size: 371 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160419/30ac8485/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail Attachment.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1084 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160419/30ac8485/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail Attachment.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2983 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20160419/30ac8485/attachment-0002.png>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list