[petsc-dev] Bug in MatShift_MPIAIJ ?

Eric Chamberland Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
Wed Oct 21 15:08:27 CDT 2015


On 21/10/15 03:36 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>    Sure, but in that "case" the count would be identical on both processes anyways and so would not detect a problem? How could the count be different?

hmmm, sorry, I think I am wrong and you are right.

It won't stop the code earlier neither detect a different error...
How come did we ended thinking that it should...??? :/

Eric




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list