[petsc-dev] Do we still need to support python 2.4?

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>    But, based on the data I have to agree with you. I am fine with moving the python required version up to 2.6

Woohoo.  This also means it is feasible to make BuildSystem support
python3 from a common codebase.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20151013/455fbf4f/attachment.sig>