[petsc-dev] new P^1.5 algorithm in VecAssembleBegin?
Mark Adams
mfadams at lbl.gov
Fri May 29 09:58:56 CDT 2015
Thanks, this code does not have any communication in VecAssembly so I added
the INGNORE stuff and added a barrier before this section of code. I am
suspecting that VecAssembly is catching load imbalance but not reporting it
for some reason.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> writes:
>
> > I am suspecting that it is catching load imbalance and just not reporting
> > it correctly. I've added a barrier in the code.
> >
> > Here are the two log files.
>
> Mark, there has always been a worst-case O(n*p) algorithm in
> VecStashScatterBegin_Private:
>
> for (i=0; i<stash->n; i++) {
> /* if indices are NOT locally sorted, need to start search at the
> beginning */
> if (lastidx > (idx = stash->idx[i])) j = 0;
> lastidx = idx;
> for (; j<size; j++) {
> if (idx >= owners[j] && idx < owners[j+1]) {
> nprocs[2*j]++; nprocs[2*j+1] = 1; owner[i] = j; break;
> }
> }
> }
>
> The branch jed/mat-assembly-perf has a scalable implementation. Can you
> try it (either in that branch or in 'next')?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150529/13e7cd15/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list