[petsc-dev] PETSC_COMM_SELF == 0

Mark Adams mfadams at lbl.gov
Tue Mar 31 12:28:04 CDT 2015


I'm not sure where we are.  My code works on Edison but fails on OSX.
Should I call PetscInitializeFortran?  I do not have a C main.


On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> PetscErrorCode PetscInitializeFortran(void)
> {
>   MPI_Fint c1=0,c2=0;
>
>   if (PETSC_COMM_WORLD) c1 =  MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_WORLD);
>   c2 =  MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_SELF);
>   petscsetcommonblock_(&c1,&c2);
>
> Note that this routine is called automatically by the Fortran
> petscinitialize function.
>
>   Barry
>
> > On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
> > No, I don't have a C main program (like the doc says).
> >
> > I can see COMM_WORLD set in the Fortran initialize wrapper, but where is
> COMM_SELF set?
> >
> >    MAtt
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
> > I'm finding that my fortran code on OSX has PETSC_COMM_SELF == 0.
> >
> > I can not find where PETSC_COMM_SELF is created.
> >
> > Its set in PetscInitializeFortran(). Did you call that?
> >
> >   Matt
> >
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150331/902e7b26/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list