[petsc-dev] did I mess up master?
Jed Brown
jed at jedbrown.org
Mon Mar 30 11:02:42 CDT 2015
Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> I interpreted this merge as 'commits were made directly to master' -
> not a separate feature branch.
It either means developing on 'master' (which has always been
discouraged) or doing a fast-forward merge of a topic branch (also
discouraged, but easier to do accidentally).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150330/56d6487a/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list