[petsc-dev] PetscSFFetchAndOpBegin_Window
Jed Brown
jed at jedbrown.org
Wed Mar 11 14:16:42 CDT 2015
Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> writes:
> Permission to ask potentially dumb questions?
Not dumb at all.
> 1) Implementing atomic read-modify-write using
> Lock->Get->Accumulate->Unlock is W.R.O.N.G. Get and Accumulate are
> NOT guaranteed to be ordered within any epoch. Ever. You appear to
> be leveraged the ordered channel semantics of MPICH's Ch3. You need
> to either use MPI-3 RMA's MPI_Get_accumulate (or MPI_Fetch_and_op) or
> use a mutex ala MPICH's ROMIO and ARMCI-MPI's MPI-2 port. See
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2005.1558687 for algorithm details.
So the secret here is that the Windown implementation was written before
MPI-3 was available and mostly exists as the proof of concept that
demonstrated that the API was useful. We pretty quickly made it
non-default and told people to never use it because Open MPI datatypes
were so broken and because we've never seen it be faster. Of course
it's dangerous to leave this incorrect code (relying on a side-effect of
the MPICH implementation) lying around, but my feeling is that this
isn't even a good (for performance) one-sided implementation, so it
should get a more major overhaul if we have reason to believe that
one-sided is a desirable interface (versus two-sided or neighborhood
collectives). What do you think?
> 2) 'sf->ranks[i]' is used in MPI_Win_lock, whereas the rest of the RMA
> calls use ranks[i]. I assume this is innocuous, but unless you have a
> mutex on 'sf', it is theoretically possible that sf->ranks[i] could be
> changed by another thread in such a way as to lead to an undefined or
> incorrect program. If you prohibit this behavior as part of the
> internal design contract, then it should be noted.
sf->ranks is not mutated after setup.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150311/c43c3662/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list