[petsc-dev] failed nightly

William Gropp wgropp at illinois.edu
Fri Apr 10 13:20:10 CDT 2015

You are 100% correct.

Unfortunately, there is a school of thought that believes otherwise.  They’re terribly wrong, but they are also vocal :(


On Apr 10, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Not testing something that doesn't work in order to not have an error in the tests doesn't seem right to me. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150410/7f97c6ee/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list