[petsc-dev] [petsc-users] unreliable AMG in PETSc
Jed Brown
jed at jedbrown.org
Mon Oct 27 17:28:21 CDT 2014
Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>> Actually, the problem is more subtle because if one wants an SPD
>> multigrid cycle, they only need that the post-smoother is the transpose
>> of the pre-smoother.
>
> Hmm. Is this true? This guy’s matrix causes grief with
> indefiniteness but since it uses SSOR smoother I think that
> post-smooth should have been the transpose of the pre smooth
> automatically?
Yes, S_pre = S_post = S is symmetric so S_pre^T = S_post trivially. But
S appears to be indefinite. It's simpler to understand indefiniteness
for symmetric matrices (like SSOR), but we shouldn't get overzealous and
put in checks for whether S is SPD.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20141027/d67ce458/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list