[petsc-dev] does next model mess up our histories

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>    Yup. Jed is saying our histories should be terrible.

;-)

There is a balancing act between "quality" of long-term history, utility
of near-term history, and development effort/opportunity for mistakes.
I personally think the sweet spot is to prefer not to rebase that which
has been merged to 'next'.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20141002/32839a7f/attachment.sig>