[petsc-dev] does next model mess up our histories

[Jed Brown]

Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> I think is ok to be a bit more messy in next. Sure there is a tradeoff
> - but you get better debugging in master :)

If bugs make it to 'master', the process has failed.

The purpose of 'next' is quality control.  We only care about the
history in 'next' so long as it makes that job easier/more reliable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20141002/0a1f3e0c/attachment.sig>