[petsc-dev] automatically updated git sample repositories
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu May 22 22:03:05 CDT 2014
On May 22, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>>> I proposed putting them in a different place because we don't want those
>>> big makefiles.
>>
>> NO NO NO you misunderstand. The mini repositories would have
>> mirrored source code but NOT mirrored makefiles, they would have
>> simple makefiles.
>
> Why do you want different makefiles in the different repos?
Because I want the user to get a simple makefile, obviously. The long term solution is to have simple makefiles in the examples directories but that has not happened yet, so a few months of “extra” makefiles seems the right compromise until we have simple makefiles.
Barry
>
> This is technically achievable, but I think we still have to worry about
> people copying the example out of the source tree into ClearCase,
> running ACME Eye Drops, and sending us winmail.dat. One less layer to
> unwrap if the makefile is the same in both places.
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list