[petsc-dev] Fwd: [petsc-users] Unexpected "Out of memory error" with SLEPC
Karl Rupp
rupp at iue.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Jun 26 15:42:15 CDT 2014
> I was thinking of catching the overflow BEFORE it hits the malloc. For example in DMSetUp_DA_3D() we have the unattractive code
>
> #if !defined(PETSC_USE_64BIT_INDICES)
> if (((Petsc64bitInt) M)*((Petsc64bitInt) N)*((Petsc64bitInt) P)*((Petsc64bitInt) dof) > (Petsc64bitInt) PETSC_MPI_INT_MAX) SETERRQ3(comm,PETSC_ERR_INT_OVERFLOW,"Mesh of %D by %D by %D (dof) is too large for 32 bit indices",M,N,dof);
> #endif
>
> Maybe we could introduce some macros like
>
> #if !defined(PETSC_USE_64BIT_INDICES)
> #define PetscCheckOverflow2(M,N) if (((Petsc64bitInt) M)*((Petsc64bitInt) N) > (Petsc64bitInt) PETSC_MPI_INT_MAX) SETERRQ3(comm,PETSC_ERR_INT_OVERFLOW,”Multiply of %D by %D bis too large for 32 bit indices",M,N;
> #else
> #define PetscCheckOverflow2(a,b)
> #endif
>
> and then check large products when they are likely to occur.
That's even better in terms of the error message. There are some beasts
like the following:
src/mat/impls/aij/mpi/mumps/mumps.c:
ierr = PetscMalloc((2*nz*sizeof(PetscInt)+nz*sizeof(PetscScalar)),
&row);CHKERRQ(ierr);
which would require multiiple PetscCheckOverflowX() uses, but I consider
this acceptable.
Best regards,
Karli
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list