[petsc-dev] PETSC_DESIRE_COMPLEX vs <petsccomplex.h>

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>   Do we really need to still protect and segregate the complex stuff
>   from petscmath.h? You want to jump straight to MPI 3 but we can’t
>   use complex? If it is just hypre then get hypre fixed.

I'm more concerned about user code that conflicts, but it's a fair point
that people should fix their code to avoid this conflict.

CHOLMOD also has/had a conflict, but that should also be fixable.  I do
prefer the simplicity, should we try it?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140728/e143cd6b/attachment.sig>