[petsc-dev] PETSC_DESIRE_COMPLEX vs <petsccomplex.h>

Jed Brown jed at jedbrown.org
Mon Jul 28 10:39:28 CDT 2014

Can we loosen the order-dependence so that instructions can be

  #include <petsccomplex.h>

instead of defining PETSC_DESIRE_COMPLEX in the compilation unit?  I
think the include is more natural and less error-prone.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140728/86ba85a7/attachment.sig>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list