[petsc-dev] PETSc 3.5.0 compilation on Windows and OpenMP with pthread
Dave Nystrom
dave.nystrom at tachyonlogic.com
Thu Jul 3 11:47:51 CDT 2014
So what exactly do you mean when you say to turn off the support for the
current pthreads support because I have been using it, such as it is, in
the next branch?
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc 3.5.0 compilation on Windows and OpenMP
> with pthread
> From: Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
> Date: Thu, July 03, 2014 10:08 am
> To: Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org>
> Cc: "petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov" <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2014, at 8:37 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>
> > Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> >> threadcomm.py is disabled in petsc3.4, 3.5. Should pthreadclasses.py also be
> >> disabled? [should openmp.py also be disabled?]
> >>
> >> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/6e5884b57154c4018286842049a07306848380f9#chg-config/PETSc/packages/threadcomm.py
> >
> > Yes, they can't do anything but cause confusion right now, and the
> > legacy "pthreadclasses" option should go away.
>
> Yes turn them all off.
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list