[petsc-dev] configure failed after update of OSX
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jan 28 13:26:47 CST 2014
I'll have to check back my e-mail archive - but I think
'/opt/local/bin/gmake' is broken. Don't you have /usr/bin/make?
I thought petsc configure prefred /usr/bin/make - if it was found.
One more -ve for macports..
Satish
------
================================================================================
TEST configureMake from config.packages.make(/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc/config/BuildSystem/config/packages/make.py:61)
TESTING: configureMake from config.packages.make(config/BuildSystem/config/packages/make.py:61)
Check for user specified make - or gmake, make
Checking for program /opt/local/bin/gmake...found
Defined make macro "MAKE" to "/opt/local/bin/gmake"
================================================================================
gmake[2]: *** read jobs pipe: No such file or directory. Stop.
gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
gmake[2]: *** write jobserver: Broken pipe. Stop.
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
gmake: INTERNAL: Exiting with 1 jobserver tokens available; should be 7!
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Mark Adams wrote:
> I managed to get macports to rebuild. It was not that hard as it turns
> out, I was just confused about exactly what to do. GDB broke but I was
> able to install it after macports updated outdated packages. PETSc still
> seem to fail in MPICH, however.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> >> > I agree a better package management system [aka macports/homebrew]
> >> > should be preferable. But with all the wierd issues that keep comping
> >> > up with users using macports on petsc lists - I can't convince myself
> >> > that it is a better recommendation.
> >>
> >> People either need a reliable way to upgrade or the stack will get out
> >> of date. Also, system upgrades will be stop-the-world events with
> >> unknown system changes and the only safe thing is to reinstall the
> >> entire stack. Very few people can remember all the installation quirks
> >> they have gone through, and even then, it takes time to reinstall
> >> everything.
> >
> >
> > This is largely ideology. Some of us have used OSX for development for
> > years
> > with little productivity impact.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >> > I would aswell recommend virtualbox with linux as a superior choice.
> >>
> >> I recommend
> >>
> >> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk0
> >>
> >> and install a decent operating system with a package manager on your
> >> now-impeccably-clean disk.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list