[petsc-dev] resurrecting the finite element energy functions thread

[Jed Brown]

Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> writes:
> It isn't, the only difference is that the function I'm imagining needs
> an extra quadrature rule argument.  Nothing here is complicated, so if
> there are no particular opinions I'll write the function and send a
> patch.  Can I write it hard coded to MPI_SUM first, and we can discuss
> how to generalize it after that?  I am less clear on how to best write
> the generalized version.

That's fine with me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140119/23231958/attachment.sig>