[petsc-dev] CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jan 19 18:07:09 CST 2014
On Jan 19, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>> User runs
>>
>> —with-cc=cc CFLAGS=“-m64” —with-debugging=0
>>
>> gets the same performance as
>>
>> —with-cc=cc CFLAGS=“-m64” —with-debugging=1
>>
>> Can’t understand why.
>
> It wouldn't have quite the _same_ performance because of PETSc debugging
> overhead, but point taken. OTOH, we may be squashing optimization flags
> internal to the wrappers
Nope because in my previous assignment I asked Satish to check for -O stuff in compiler wrappers as well as CFLAGS.
> and some compilers have funny names for
> optimization flags.
This is a small possibility because normally there is a -Od as well as the funny named other stuff. If we come upon another funny name that replaces -Od we can incorporate that as well.
Barry
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list