[petsc-dev] CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS

[Jed Brown]

Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm inclined to do this because it's less code and simpler logic, thus
>> the easiest to explain.  If they don't set CFLAGS, of course we have to
>> automatically choose reasonable defaults based on --with-debugging.
>>
>
> I think changing to this is worse than what we currently have.

Why?

I just talked to Brad and he mentioned that he tried to use CFLAGS and
the optimization flags were masked.  If COPTFLAGS is not clear to an
expert like him, something is wrong with what we have.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140119/61d0690f/attachment.sig>