[petsc-dev] workflow diagram

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>   Good. Now with the new next introduced it could be confusing that
>   there are two next since the original next has an arrow head How
>   about removing that final error head and somehow marking the end of
>   line (of the first next line) with a little box or something.

I tried something to give that impression.  I think we're converging on
a local optimum here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140430/0c55c32d/attachment.sig>