[petsc-dev] sor smoothers

[Jed Brown]

Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> I think the current approach is simpler..
>
> if !defined(PETSC_HAVE_STDINT_H) && defined(PETSC_HAVE___INT64)
> typedef __int64 .....

The PETSC_SIZEOF_ macros could be removed.  (We can probably remove most
or all of them now, but most of their uses would go away.)  Not a big
issue, but fewer tests in configure and fewer preprocessor clauses in
PETSc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130909/02c9b4a6/attachment.sig>