[petsc-dev] C++11, compatibility versus simplicity

[Satish Balay]

On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Jed Brown wrote:

> Tim Tautges <tautges at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> 
> > Any idea how well the standard large parallel platforms support C++11?
> 
> You can install a recent version of GCC anywhere and Clang most places.
> The LLVM backend for Blue Gene is pretty good (or XL is pretty bad).
> Other compilers have varying levels of support.
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport

configure appears to test for <random> and this is failing on OSX with
clang-3.2. Is this supporsed to work?

balay at petsc-mini petsc.test (next)]$ clang++ -v
Apple LLVM version 4.2 (clang-425.0.28) (based on LLVM 3.2svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.4.0
Thread model: posix
[balay at petsc-mini petsc.test (next)]$ 

Satish
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: configure.log
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20131008/27b6eb6c/attachment.ksh>