[petsc-dev] Propose a change for PetscObjectDestroyOptionsHandlers()

[Jed Brown]

Please use reply-all so the response includes the list, in case anyone
else is following this.

Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> writes:

> On 14 May 2013 14:13, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> PetscObjectDestroyOptionsHandlers() do not check if the registered
>>> destroy routine is NULL. In general, the destroy routines are
>>> optional. Should we fix this in maint?
>>
>> Yes, does this break something now?  It is not used by anything in
>> PETSc, petsc4py, SLEPc, or TAO, so hopefully it's not an urgent fix.
>
> No, it is not urgent. But I wanted to ask ASAP before I forget. So I'm
> goint to make a PR to maint. Thanks.

Great.