[petsc-dev] Uncrustify has fucked up my file

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 19:42:03 CST 2013


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This essentially already *was* consistent throughout PETSc already, the
>>> exception being src/dm/*. It is, however, not written explicitly in the
>>> style guide (yet).
>>>
>>
>> Then I don't want it. I am reverting.
>>
>
> Matt, you were really the only exception to this rule. It's bit in the
> emacs convention, and I think is already in .dir-locals.el. Just live with
> it.
>

I am abiding by all the screwed up stuff that is written down. Not what
isn't.

The blank lines were in the middle of code, not between variables and code.

   Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130131/99b31055/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list