[petsc-dev] Coding style and its violations...
Jed Brown
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jan 15 15:40:56 CST 2013
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Karl Rupp <rupp at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> The problem is that uncrustify is exactly the PETSc style so we
>> can't do that comparison automatically. Otherwise we would just run
>> uncrustify on all pushes.
>>
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand the first sentence.
I'm pretty sure it was just missing a negation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130115/6df17a6b/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list