[petsc-dev] Forward declarations of types?
    Chetan Jhurani 
    chetan.jhurani at gmail.com
       
    Fri Feb 15 17:24:16 CST 2013
    
    
  
Interjecting.  Talking of conventions, it is likely that Boost picked
it up from the C++ iostream (heavy) and iosfwd (light) standard
headers.
 
Chetan
 
From: petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Jed Brown
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:51 PM
To: For users of the development version of PETSc
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Forward declarations of types?
 
 
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
petsc*fwd.h or petsc*types.h? Is there an established convention here?
 
Here's one documented convention.
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/07/14827.php
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130215/b0ab8d32/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list