[petsc-dev] Forward declarations of types?

Chetan Jhurani chetan.jhurani at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 17:24:16 CST 2013


Interjecting.  Talking of conventions, it is likely that Boost picked

it up from the C++ iostream (heavy) and iosfwd (light) standard

headers.

 

Chetan

 

From: petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Jed Brown
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:51 PM
To: For users of the development version of PETSc
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Forward declarations of types?

 

 

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

petsc*fwd.h or petsc*types.h? Is there an established convention here?

 

Here's one documented convention.


http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/07/14827.php

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130215/b0ab8d32/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list