[petsc-dev] ugliness due to missing lapack routines

[Jed Brown]

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>  There is no need for a JIT to do this. It is just a configurable library
> where you have your system generate the needed items (source code that is
> passed to the compiler) from the base (PETSc) source code based on the
> needs of that application.


How would we have plugins and dynamic configuration without a JIT? You want
to recompile (using the god preprocessor that sees all and knows all) every
time the user tweaks the model or algorithm? No thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130207/9b93e9f5/attachment.html>