[petsc-dev] Pushing non-working code

[Sean Farley]

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can you quantify your productivity gains that come from pushing
>>>> checkpoints instead of waiting for a semantically meaningful point to merge
>>>> and push?
>>>
>>>
>>> I can quantify the losses from the changed you propose, which is all I
>>> need to do.
>>
>>
>> Do share.
>
>
> Its more work for me. Clearly you are asking me to do something I do not
> currently do. A loss.
>
>>>
>>> There are no "gains" from a baseline. This is
>>> a point I have made multiple times. Changes must be justified.
>>
>>
>> I provided a long list of justifications that you have not responded to.
>> There is a great deal of empirical evidence to back my claims.
>
>
> I have responded to each and every point carefully. You need to listen.

I have been following this conversation closely but have not seen you
respond to any of the points on code review, new bugs, etc. I have
seen you complain that you don't want to change your habits, though.