[petsc-dev] Fortran stubs
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Dec 19 17:22:58 CST 2013
On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> is there a good reason not to add rules for all the fortran stubs with the right dependencies, and call bfort individually?
Can all the generated files also go in ${PETSC_ARCH} instead of within the source code so that I can have different branches with different arches and switch between them without having to regenerate (and remove) the fortran stubs appropriate for that particular arch — branch.
Barry
>
> Matt
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list