[petsc-dev] fortran examples and tutorials testing

[Matthew Knepley]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Travis Austin <austin at txcorp.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks for the quick response.  A related question is are examples in the
> tutorials tested before the release or
> only the examples in tests?
>

Everything is tested (I gather not everything got fixed).

   Matt


> Travis
>
> ===============================
> Travis Austin, Ph.D
> VP, Computational Mathematics
> Tech-X Corporation
> 5621 Arapahoe Ave
> Boulder, CO 80303
> austin at txcorp.com
> ===============================
>
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Travis Austin <austin at txcorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been digging into the tutorials directories in PETSc and wanting
>> to understand how the makefile breaks up fortran
>> examples into TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90.  (This is follow
>> on work from the Tech-X Phase
>> I related to PETSc.)
>>
>> There appear to be some F90 examples that are mixed in
>> TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN.  For example, in the snes
>> tutorials, I see this:
>>
>> snes/examples/tutorials/makefile:TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN = ex1f.PETSc
>> runex1f ex1f.rm ex40f90.PETSc runex40f90 ex40f90.rm
>>
>
> Its a mistake.
>
>
>> In other places, anything with an f90 in the name is under
>> TESTEXAMPLES_F90.
>>
>> Is there any particular strategy for how files are placed
>> under TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90?
>>
>> Another related question is that some of the F90 examples have a .F
>> suffix and others have a .F90 suffix which is of course
>> related to formatting but my guess is the committer of these files just
>> following their own preferences.
>> (See snes/examples/tutorials/ex39f90.F and ex40f90.F90.)
>>
>
> F90 is wrong, another mistake.
>
>    Matt
>
>
>> Does anyone know if there was a reason that ex39f90 was made *.F and
>> ex40f90 was make *.F90?  I'm trying to parse some
>> of these examples based on suffixes and different suffixes makes is a bit
>> more cumbersome.
>>
>> Thanks for any help,
>> Travis
>>
>> ===============================
>> Travis Austin, Ph.D
>> VP, Computational Mathematics
>> Tech-X Corporation
>> 5621 Arapahoe Ave
>> Boulder, CO 80303
>> austin at txcorp.com
>> ===============================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130416/a29cdea2/attachment.html>