[petsc-dev] PetscFindInt

[Blaise A Bourdin]

Nvm, int, not string. My bad...


Sent from a mobile device

On Sep 23, 2012, at 12:37 AM, "Blaise A Bourdin" <bourdin at lsu.edu> wrote:

> I'm not sure if I'm following the whole discussion but isn't the index fortran intrinsic the equivalent of this PetscFindInt? (Modulo returning a negative value) In which case, not having a fortran binding would not be a big deal.
> 
> Blaise
> 
> Sent from a mobile device
> 
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 11:36 PM, "Jed Brown" <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am fine with overloading the return value. It won't change how I use it.
>> 
>> http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/4abec2d5e3ad
>> 
>> It's a shame we can't have C99-style "inline" semantics. I'd like to give the compiler the option of inlining it, but I don't know how to do Fortran bindings for that (other than write it custom) if I make it a PETSC_STATIC_INLINE. Oh well, that can wait.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120923/9f12525b/attachment.html>