[petsc-dev] petsc release soon

[Barry Smith]

On Mar 12, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Sean Farley wrote:

> But we don't have this model. We have petscvec.h petscsys.h etc etc. then the model breaks down. Hence I like the petsc-private. Jed gets what he wants and I get what I want. Plus it doesn't break the current PETSc application code.
> 
> Then what is petsc.h? You just need to include the right directory with -I in the petsc makefiles then everybody wins.

   The problem is we dump all the petscvec.h etc crap also at /usr/include PLUS there would be stuff in /usr/include/petsc/*.h   this is confusing. Why is some inside and why some outside? This is why I said Jed's model of standard usage didn't work for us.