[petsc-dev] petsc release soon

[Sean Farley]

>
> I agree that petsc/include/petsc is stupid. I see no reason to change the
> perfectly logical include/private just to match what
> some idiot programmers did.
>

Huh? So, if I install petsc with a --prefix, and (god-forbid!) some other
project also has a 'private' directory, then there's now a conflict. Jed
isn't just pulling this convention out of his ass here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120312/136a6885/attachment.html>