[petsc-dev] petsc release soon

[Satish Balay]

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> > 
> > 3. Move all private headers from include/private/ to include/petsc/ (convention adopted by hundreds of packages) or include/petsc-private/ (like Tk).
> 
>   I prefer petsc-private because if one installs in the xxxx/petsc/  you get this stupid looking  xxxx/petsc/include/petsc.   Better xxxx/petsc/include/petsc-private

Personally - I'm fine with include/petsc/. But isn't this notation
more for having 'all' includes in '/usr/include/petsc' - and not for
spliting them in 2 dirs /usr/include/, /usr/include/petsc

Also - I see the following notation used for mutiple version installs..

balay at petsc:/usr/include $ ls -ld py*
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2010-07-26 17:05 python2.5/
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2010-10-06 07:41 python2.6/
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2011-09-09 07:47 python2.6_d/
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2011-12-20 08:05 python3.1/


Satish