[petsc-dev] who did this?

[Matthew Knepley]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just do regexp.
>>
>
> Okay, are you missing these sort and grep parts? (regexen are so
> fragile...)
>

I just get out the args+# procs and output file


>
>
>>
>>
>>> I like the semantic information of having multiple tests using the same
>>> base options and/or comparing to the same output (rather than normalizing
>>> when you specify the tests).
>>>
>>
>> Shell is not the place for that. Years of putting crapy shell into
>> makefiles before having to pull it out
>> should have taught us something.
>>
>
> I agree, but if we can automatically parse those, we can replace them
> wholesale with something better.
>

I think this is overkill. There were only 2 of these in Vec and 3 in SNES
(I think)

   Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120705/a4fb018d/attachment.html>