[petsc-dev] hdf5.py is messed up
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Jan 19 10:15:03 CST 2012
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:06, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I do not see that being in any way superior, and my way allows us to pull
> > directly from the HDF5 site.
> >
>
> Keeping a repo allows us to version patches. With a repository, you can
> always generate a single complete patch against the upstream release
> version.
> It's not clear to me that rolling our own tarball is better or
> worse than patching from upstream.
Rolling our own tarball should be an intermediate solution until the
issue gets fixed in the upstream traball.. [we should send
patches/bugreports to upstream. sometimes were are lazy wrt this..]
Satish
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list