[petsc-dev] Merge sets
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 22:34:35 CST 2012
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> > 2) If the rebase implementation has been fixed from the hacky
> > versions that fucked unnecessarily with my file system I'll be happy
> > to start using rebase. Is it fixed?
>
> The issue is:
>
> >>
> When file 'a.c' is locally commited, and a pull potentially has
> changes to 'b.c', 'pull --rebase' also changes the timestamp on a.c
> [whereas 'pull; merge; commit' does not change timestamp on a.c]
> <<
>
> Latest hg [version 2.1] still updates the timestamp of a.c on rebase.
>
> Rebase is doing state changes [wrt commit states] - in this process I
> think removes local changesets and recommits them - so the locally
> changed files get new timestamps in this process.
>
> The fact that 'make' relies on timestamps messes things up [causing
> unnecessary recompiles]. Reseting timestamps on unchanged files would
> be a good optimziation - which is what Barry wants..
Ah, I don't see it because the Python build uses md5. Doesn't cmake?
Matt
>
> Satish
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120218/ea6c601e/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list